← The Scoliom blog

Guides

Report cards: from marks entry to parents' phones

14 June 2026

The scene plays out three times a year. The end-of-term review is approaching. The marks exist, but they are everywhere: in a notebook, in a spreadsheet kept by each teacher, sometimes in a marks tool that only some teachers use. In the school office, staff gather, copy out and recalculate the averages. Then the report cards are laid out in a word processor, class by class, pupil by pupil.

A few days later, the report cards go out in school bags. Some reach the parents. Others stay folded at the bottom of a bag. And the school phone rings: "We never received the report card." "The maths average looks wrong to us." "Could you send us another copy?" Every call takes time from a team that has none left.

Where the chain breaks

The problem is almost never the marks entry itself. Teachers mark; it is their job. The problem is what happens between the mark and the parent. The report-card chain breaks in the middle, at every change of tool: a mark entered in one place then copied elsewhere, an average recalculated by hand with weightings recalled from memory, a report card retyped in a separate document.

Every copy introduces a risk of error. And every error a family discovers chips away at trust: a wrong average on a report card is hard to forgive. Paper distribution adds one final break. The school has no way of knowing whether the report card reached the parents. It finds out over the phone.

The complete chain, from the mark to parents' phones

A report-card chain that holds is one where the mark is entered only once, then travels without ever being touched again:

• Entry by class and by subject: each teacher enters their marks for their class and their subject, with the assessments they have chosen.
• Weightings defined once: the weightings by subject and by assessment are set at the start of the term, not pieced together from memory at calculation time.
• Averages calculated automatically: the pupil's average, the class average, without a single manual operation.
• Report card generated: the document brings together the marks, the averages and the teachers' comments, in the school's own format, ready for the end-of-term review.
• Publication in the family space: once approved, the report card is placed in each family's space, where they can view it whenever they wish and find it again in later years.

The result can be measured at the switchboard: fewer calls asking for a copy, fewer disputed averages, and end-of-term reviews prepared with documents that are already right.

Already have a marks tool? Keep it

Many schools have a marks tool that works, that teachers know, and that produces perfectly sound report cards. Replacing it mid-year would be a mistake: you do not change the marking habits of forty teachers between two terms.

In that case, the right approach is simpler: keep the existing marks tool, and import the PDF report cards it produces so they can be published in the family space. The teaching chain does not move. Only the distribution changes: the report card stops travelling in a school bag and reaches the parents directly, who acknowledge it simply by viewing it. Later, and only if it so decides, the school can bring marks entry closer to the rest of its administration. Nothing obliges it to — least of all a software vendor's timetable.

Every school has its own chain, with its own tools and habits. Before changing it, you have to look at it as it is: who enters what, where the re-keying happens, what families actually receive. That is the purpose of a remote assessment, carried out on your current organisation. You only replace well what you have first understood. And sometimes, you replace almost nothing.